Well, on the other hand, since the only scenario I can imagine using <acknowledged/> in the wild has significantly different semantics from readdisplayed markers, I think that this is not really necessary in this XEP.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 1:11 PM Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> wrote:
> 3) It's really not. Some clients and intermediaries need to know whether they should expect a marker or not. No need to check this prior to sending a <markable/>, true, but useful to track missing markers afterward.
>
> Where was the discussion of this, and (more broadly) how does one know what the discussion and rationale and consensus is if not on this list?
I can add it back. When I showed this to people in the XSF room I
guess most people just considered the "does it hurt to
opportunistically include the <markable/>" side of things.
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list -- standards@xmpp.org
To unsubscribe send an email to standards-leave@xmpp.org