[Council] meeting + privacy lists

[Peter Saint-Andre]

I'm flexible on the time. We could even do this Tuesday (tomorrow) if
that's better.

Chris Mullins wrote:
> I'll try to make it. 
> 
> I've got a meeting scheduled with the EDD's Architecture Review Board,
> and they haven't yet let me know when I'm presenting. 
> 
> As soon as I get a concrete answer, I'll post it here. Fortunately, with
> 5 members there's still a quorum even if I can't make it.
> 
> --
> Chris Mullins
> http://www.coversant.net/blogs/cmullins
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: council-bounces at jabber.org [mailto:council-bounces at jabber.org] On
> Behalf Of Peter Saint-Andre
> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 10:15 AM
> To: council at jabber.org
> Subject: [Council] meeting + privacy lists
> 
> OK, let's hold a brief meeting this Wednesday (October 4) at 17:00 UTC,
> that's 18:00 UTC+1. If that time does not work, please post to the list.
> I can do 18:00 or 19:00 or whatever if that's preferable. The meeting
> will be held in xmpp:council at conference.jabber.org (our usual venue).
> 
> A proposed agenda is here:
> 
> http://www.jabber.org/council/meetings/agendas/2006-10-04.html
> 
> The agenda is so brief because:
> 
> (1) I'm deep in revisions to the XMPP RFCs
> 
> (2) I'm working to re-launch xmpp.org on Wednesday
> 
> (3) the Council needs to select a Chair in order to function properly
> (e.g., it's the Chair who sets the agenda for meetings)
> 
> (4) the Council has a backlog of proposed specs to consider, see the
> last agenda from the Fifth Council:
> 
> http://www.jabber.org/council/meetings/agendas/2006-09-13.html
> 
> (5) I've received some other proposals too but have been waiting to
> announce them until the JEP->XEP transition is finished
> 
> So I propose that we hold a brief orientation meeting this week and then
> hold a more substantive meeting next week.
> 
> But one item we need to vote on (IMHO) is approving version 1.4 of
> JEP-0016, which now contains all and only the content from Section 10 of
> RFC 3291 (i.e., privacy lists) and which I propose we change from a
> Draft Standards Track JEP to an Active Historical JEP.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Peter
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20061002/7ba7b958/smime-0001.bin