[Council] meeting reminder

[Dave Cridland]

On Wed Nov 21 17:12:05 2007, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> If the LDAP folks haven't standardized this, there is no expectation
> that we users of LDAP protocols will do so. As far as I can see,  
> LDAP
> groups are implementation-specific and deployment-specific.

There are some standardized representations of groups, I believe -  
the trouble is, there's more than one.

>  We defined
> the "muc#roominfo_ldapgroup" field for people who deploy MUC in
> enterprise environments. However, the exact nature of the LDAP group
> behind that field depends on how that organization has set up its
> directories. Or so it seems to me.

That's fine, but I think the document needs to be clear it's a field  
with a locally defined value.

Oh, is this meant to be an LDAP URL, or a search filter, or a DN? Or  
doesn't that matter?

Dave.
-- 
Dave Cridland - mailto:dave at cridland.net - xmpp:dwd at jabber.org
  - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
  - http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade