[jadmin] Re: Google Talk federation policy proposal
admin at flosoft.biz
Fri Aug 26 11:23:50 CDT 2005
Well, same with eMail. But Blacklist don't bring alot. I am sure Fabio the
moment you put up a Blacklist network you will be able to override it will
come out. Best example: DynDNS. Just change your domain! It is free! Ok ...
maybe IP blocking? No, most hackers don't have a static IP and just reset
their Router / Modem. Not to mention Proxies. There are million ways to
The great thing about Jabber is that there is NO real supervising power.
Everyone is free to do what he wants! If Google uses such a standard they
will make sure that something like this will not happen on their Servers.
They will surely already have a protection in development. And maybe they will
make it publically available soon.
Google can't permit themselves to bring an unsecure System on the market! They
have too much to use and developping such an extension doesn't cost much for
On Friday 26 August 2005 18:08, Jesper Krogh wrote:
> I gmane.network.jabber.admin, skrev Florian Jensen:
> > Isn't this all getting to complex? I mean Jabber used to be a free
> > Platform.
> An it certainly should continue to be that.
> > And anyway. It is not our Problem if Google Talk gets Spammed. The
> > Jabber=20 Network is running since 6 years without any of these problems.
> > So now a big Company joins in and we have to change everything? Probably
> > their Servers are equiped with something to protect them from that.
> > Google never said that Spam would be the reason why they didn't open S2S
> > connections. Maybe it is just because they haven't finished their
> > component yet.
> > So just wait until Google makes the first move.
> This is a problem that probably should be dealt with anyway.. If Google
> or <insert any other xmpp-network here> opens for S2S communication,
> there is currently no way to ensure that a spammer won't inject spam
> into the system by setting up their own server. The bigger the complete
> network is .. the more likely.
> Completely avoid spam is probably not reachable but it is definately an
> issue to consider.
More information about the JAdmin