[jadmin] Google Talk federation policy proposal

Trejkaz trejkaz at trypticon.org
Fri Aug 26 20:39:45 CDT 2005


On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 07:25, Florian Jensen wrote:
> This will end in a big mess with modificated Blacklists and no server
> trusting no other server. This will even give more problems with the Jabber
> Server connectivity. So you'll have for example:
>
> Server1 can connect to: Server 3 and Server 4
> Server2 can connect to: Server 1 and Server 3
> Server3 can connect to: Server 1 , Server 2 and Server4
> Server4 can connect to: Server 2.
>
> So many connections are one way only.

"One way" means "no way".

In that scenario above, the only servers able to talk to each other would be 1 
and 3.  Server 4 could _connect_ to 2, sure, but would 2 accept a connection 
from 4 if it's on their blacklist?  Of course they wouldn't. :-)

TX

-- 
             Email: Trejkaz Xaoza <trejkaz at trypticon.org>
          Web site: http://trypticon.org/
         Jabber ID: trejkaz at jabber.zim.net.au
   GPG Fingerprint: 9EEB 97D7 8F7B 7977 F39F  A62C B8C7 BC8B 037E EA73
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/jadmin/attachments/20050827/84eff1dc/attachment-0006.pgp>


More information about the JAdmin mailing list