[jadmin] XMPPD vs JabberD as a name

[Jesus Cea]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> [insert long history of the "JABBER" name here]

+1

Please, do :-). I'm veruy interested in such arcane items.

> Agreed -- I think more creative names are more more memorable and less
> subject to confusion.

We can't force any developer how to name her product. Peer presure is
the only way, and I am sure we have far more important issues to fight for.

I agree than XMPPD is pretty boring. But, also, a free riding for those
guys. If you have to choose a XMPP server for your enterprise and find
names like "WildFire" or "soapbox" along "xmppd" server, just guess what
server will be the first try :-). I know which I could open the homepage
first.

So, I understand the motivation to such name. That denomination will be
used by somebody sometime, soon or later. It is boring, but it is, also,
free marketing.

- --
Jesus Cea Avion                         _/_/      _/_/_/        _/_/_/
jcea at argo.es http://www.argo.es/~jcea/ _/_/    _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/
jabber / xmpp:jcea at jabber.org         _/_/    _/_/          _/_/_/_/_/
                               _/_/  _/_/    _/_/          _/_/  _/_/
"Things are not so easy"      _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/
"My name is Dump, Core Dump"   _/_/_/        _/_/_/      _/_/  _/_/
"El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQCVAwUBRWJX6Zlgi5GaxT1NAQLergP7BkDOnnUDLFL7GJLO41n3DuQKhe+Rl+Tg
EWTAVa8IAp9T7saz+GdYRlfbaOOEsSH86duI68Ef/IDhS/56yIqKdKnLyCe7LgW6
QSIh0/m1pgg+vXBOMKUbYz2F6zey20mEUGFfNEin8S3gYNcojeqreX9T2ePnufZB
guwVOTaRBhg=
=T8gu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----