[jadmin] transparent transports?

[Luke -Jr]

Requiring the JID to be the same on MSN provides for better integration. MSN 
access would imply Yahoo access too. AIM/ICQ are another problem altogether-- 
perhaps mappings would be required for them.

On Thursday 31 May 2007 16:02, Pedro Melo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to setup the current transports that way? I don't know
> of any server who would colaborate with the transports to do such a
> thing.
>
> Would it be possible to do? Probably yes.
>
> I don't know if it would be worth it. It seems a limitation requiring
> the Jabber ID to be the same as the MSN account. It would not work
> for any of the others (yahoo, aol, icq).
>
> Best regards,
>
> On May 30, 2007, at 5:31 PM, Luke -Jr wrote:
> > Is it possible to setup transports such that the server manages them
> > completely? eg, when a user connects via XMPP, the transport
> > authenticates
> > them to the equivalent MSN account and provides normal @hotmail.com
> > and such?
> > _______________________________________________
> > JAdmin mailing list
> > JAdmin at jabber.org
> > http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jadmin
> > FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/about/jadminfaq.shtml
> > _______________________________________________