[jadmin] trusted federation
Neil Stevens
neil at hakubi.us
Thu Jan 17 19:53:43 CST 2008
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> We heard the same arguments in October 2000 when we started enforcing
> dialback.
Dialback doesn't place a burden on the admin to go out and kowtow to
some arbitrary third party before being able to get online. Dialback is
just a software feature. Big difference I think.
> Is is acceptable that we are sending communications in the clear over
> s2s links?
>
> Would our network be even larger if we enforced s2s encryption, since
> big XMPP deployments that are not currently federated would join the
> network?
>
> I ask the questions. I don't say I have all the answers yet.
Well, throw my data point in the pile :-)
--
Neil Stevens - neil at hakubi.us
If you're seeing shades of gray, it's because you're not
looking close enough to see the black and white dots.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/jadmin/attachments/20080117/e4ff78f8/attachment-0003.pgp>
More information about the JAdmin
mailing list