[jdev] JEP-0085 clarification
nicfit at gmail.com
Tue Sep 6 21:26:19 CDT 2005
> Quoting Travis Shirk <nicfit at gmail.com>:
> > For completeness, if step #2 involved UserB getting distracted and
> > surfing the web for the next N+1 seconds an <inactive/> MUST be sent.
This was just an example of a more sane implementation, not an algorithm
that I think the JEP should require clients to implement. Having said
that, I think requiring at least this is better then requiring less
(e.g., a simple focus change). Unnecessary inactive/active packets is
annoying to the receiver, not to mention unfriendly to the network.
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 11:17 +1000, Trejkaz wrote:
> Meanwhile, using window coverage to determine whether attention is being
> feels like a much more sensible approach. If the text is visible, you're
> paying attention. If it isn't, you're not. Approximate to mean "the
> instead of "the text" to make implementation easier. :-)
Now this is what I'm talking about!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the JDev