[Jingle] XEP-0177 : oops

[Jeff Williams]

Hi Peter,

The XEP-0177 example 5 & 6 don't validate given the existing  
namespaces.  These are the examples from the spec that cover the case  
that Detlev wants clarified.  The XML document validator returns  
"Invalid content was found starting with element 'trying'.

If you open the example and XSD files you'll see that I marked where  
they don't pass validation.  (Look for "spec-error".)  Most of the  
time it's just typos or missing (implied) pieces.  In this case of  
these examples the namespace is not quite right.

Also, do you have a position on having exactly one top-level element  
in each XSD/namespace (with top-level complexType defining types from  
that name namespace.)  This way we force valid documents to adhere to  
the structure implied in the examples.  As XEP-0166 stands the  
following XML document is well-formed and valid:

	<!-- XEP-0166 example 1 -->
	<iq from="kingclaudius at shakespeare.lit/castle" id="jingle1" to="laertes at shakespeare.lit 
/castle" type="set">
		<content xmlns="urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle" creator="initiator"  
name="JMF"></content>
	</iq>

Jeff

On Jul 27, 2008, at 19:01 , Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> Jeff Williams wrote:
>> Forgot to mention that Detlev's noted example from XEP-0177 doesn't  
>> pass validation.
>
> Which example is that?
>
> /psa
>