[Jingle] [Fwd: Re: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-tcp-08.txt]
ml at update.uu.se
Thu Oct 15 05:43:05 CDT 2009
tor 2009-10-15 klockan 11:46 +0200 skrev Dirk Meyer:
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> > FYI. Feel free to speak up on the mmusic list if you care about ICE-TCP
> > (it might be useful for Jingle file transfer).
> IMHO XEP-0260 provides everything Jingle file transfer needs to get
> implemented. ICE-TCP may be a good future Jingle transport, but it is
> not needed.
I mostly agree, although, one advantage I can see with ICE-TCP is that
it would be possible to use it with a future TURN-TCP instead of the
current S5B proxies, which are XMPP-specific.
But, yeah, for the time being 0260+0261 is enough to get a working
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Note: It has been reported that the simultaneous-open technique
> > has a low success rate (~40%) with the population of NAT devices
> > in use as of this writing.
> simultaneous-open is not supported by XEP-0260 and it looks like it does
> not really work anyway.
> > Therefore, it is RECOMMENDED that implementations of this
> > specification acquire and use IPv6 host candidates. Means of
> > doing so across NATs include Tunnel Setup Protocol
> > [I-D.blanchet-v6ops-tunnelbroker-tsp], Teredo [RFC4380], IPSec
> > NAT-T [RFC3947], and others.
> XEP-0260 supports Teredo and IPv6 and even has IPv6 in an example.
> Dirk, who would love to see Jingle file transfer based on XEP-0260
Phone +46 (0)18 250582 | Cell +46 (0)733 386299
XMPP mlundblad at jabber.org | ICQ 11604698
MSN ml at update.uu.se | Y!M marcuslundblad
More information about the Jingle