[PubSub] (no subject)

Tuomas Koski koski.tuomas at gmail.com
Thu Apr 23 17:10:24 CDT 2009


Hi,

2009/4/22 Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 4/22/09 7:50 AM, Robin Collier wrote:
>
>> I fail to see how this is any different then the max_items case.  Both
>> serve the exact same purpose but simply use different criteria to
>> determine when to remove older items.  If this is outside of the scope
>> of the spec, then why supply the ability to limit at all?  By it's
>> current inclusion (by number) it does in fact make it within the scope
>> of the spec.
>>
>> For the record, I am not actually making use of this, but thought it
>> made sense as a feature.
>
> If anyone else wants item_expire I'd be happy to add it. I can see it
> being useful in some scenarios, and it meets a different need from
> max_items.

I agree. I would find it useful. +1


br,
--
tuomas


More information about the PubSub mailing list