[standards-jig] Packet Header JEP 0033
nick at jabberstudio.org
Fri May 24 10:52:06 CDT 2002
I like the idea, but maybe we need to just define an attribute inside
the x:header instead of people juggling three new namespaces.
just my US$0.02
Joe Hildebrand wrote:
> I've gone back and forth on the delivered='yes' attribute a couple of times.
> I tried capturing the delivery information in the trace elements, but that
> didn't work well. After talking with Craig, the approach in the JEP was the
> one we decided would be the most implementable. I guess I could imagine a
> couple of other ways of doing this, too. Let me think about it some.
> Another thing that I don't like is that the rules for delivery and
> re-delivery are a little complex, particularly with respect to BCC's. It
> seems like there should be something simpler. Maybe this is all part of the
> same problem...
> Also, what do people think about splitting the three sections of the header
> into three different namepsaces, rather than putting them all into the
> So, something like:
More information about the Standards-JIG