[standards-jig] JEP-0045 Suggestions
richard at dobson-i.net
Tue Sep 17 08:32:13 UTC 2002
Of course the protocol will carry the information on wether it will be
banning a user from a room or the whole server, else how is the server going
to act on the command? telepathy? :) hehe
But yes the idea of having duration of the ban is a good idea, so it can be
for a set duration or forever.
I only wrote this message because of a different reason, the person I was
replying to was making a big thing about it that it should not be easy for
the administrator to ban someone from an entire room (i do not agree with
that but..) but that has nothing to do with the protocol for performing that
action, it is up to the client/admin tool developers to decide how hard or
easy they are going to make it for a user to perform those actions.
----- Original Message -----
>From: "Nathaniel Borenstein" <nsb at guppylake.com>
To: <standards-jig at jabber.org>; <standards-jig at jabber.org>
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: [standards-jig] JEP-0045 Suggestions
> > Fine, if that is how you want it, but thats got nothing to do with the
> > protocol for doing the actual banning of people, that is up to the
> > client/admin tool developers and is outside the scope of the protocol we
> > discussing now to do that.
> Don't the client/admin tool developers need to know whether the banning
> is *intended* to be single-room or all-rooms? If so, the protocol needs
> to carry that information. Are there any other parameters a client
> might want to know? How about the duration of the ban, does it really
> always need to be permanent?
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
More information about the Standards