[standards-jig] UPDATED AGAIN: Multi-User Chat, v. 0.4

David Sutton jabber at dsutton.legend.uk.com
Thu Sep 19 12:51:22 CDT 2002


*grin* just checking on how complete you wanted the JEP. Another example
wouldn't hurt, clarifying the point made

Regards,

  David

On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 10:45:35AM -0500, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> The example is normal, but the text says it can be anything *other* than
> groupchat. Would another example make you happy? :)
> 
> Peter
> 
> --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> Jabber Software Foundation
> http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.html
> 
> On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, David Sutton wrote:
> 
> > Hi again,
> > 
> >   Ok, nit-picking time. 
> > 
> >   How complete should a jep be? You've covered sending normal messages
> >   to room users, but not mentioned that you can also send 'chat'
> >   messages to room users as well.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> >   David
> > 
> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 01:52:10AM -0500, David Sutton wrote:
> > > Hi again,
> > > 
> > >   One thing came to me. For kick and ban, the ability to specify a
> > >   reason would be good. I've some ideas for the implementation and that
> > >   would be a useful thing to have. This could be done as a <reason> tag
> > >   under jabber:gc:admin. Would it be a good idea for the ban list to
> > >   also return who banned and any reason?
> > > 
> > >   I'm also wondering over having server admins who could override a room
> > >   ownership, defined in the configuration file. 
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > 
> > >   David
> > >   
> > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 11:29:52PM -0500, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> > > > I have just released version 0.4 of the multi-user chat JEP. This contains
> > > > some major changes, including:
> > > > 
> > > > 1. Removed that /kick and /ban junk, what a hack!
> > > > 
> > > > 2. Added protocol for including participant privileges (admin and voice)  
> > > > in presence updates.
> > > > 
> > > > 3. Added use cases for granting/revoking voice and approving/denying
> > > > messages held for approval in moderated rooms.
> > > > 
> > > > 4. A few other niceties.
> > > > 
> > > > I think this is now getting to be fairly complete and even (*gasp*) worth
> > > > considering in a serious manner. I will probably release a 0.4.1 version
> > > > by about 18:00 UTC tomorrow in order to address a few minor points, so
> > > > keep those cards and letters coming! :)
> > > > 
> > > > http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0045.html
> > > > 
> > > > Peter
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > Peter Saint-Andre
> > > > Jabber Software Foundation
> > > > http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.html
> > > > 
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Standards-JIG mailing list
> > > > Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > David Sutton
> > > Email: dsutton at legend.co.uk
> > > Jabber: peregrine at legend.net.uk
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > David Sutton
> > Email: dsutton at legend.co.uk
> > Jabber: peregrine at legend.net.uk
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig

-- 
David Sutton
Email: dsutton at legend.co.uk
Jabber: peregrine at legend.net.uk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20020919/1ef14158/attachment.pgp


More information about the Standards-JIG mailing list