[standards-jig] Version 0.6 of JEP-0045 (Multi-User Chat)

[nick]

Who says that we need a hierachy? What about a hierachy is so important 
when it comes to this protocol? The protocol should _not_ reflect the 
implementation, yet that is exactly what you are advocating. By making 
the protocol implementation specific you are basically killing any other 
ideas or improvements to the protocol. What if the implementation 
suddenly has a design flaw? Would you suggest going back and altering 
the protocol to meet application specs? If, so I don't you want you 
anywhere near any projects I'm working on.

Pasi Parnanen wrote:

>The protocol has to handle parent/child relationships between rooms.
>That's it basically. Without that there's no chance to implement any
>hierarchy.
>