[standards-jig] LAST CALL: Server-Based Privacy Rules (JEP-0016)
ben at blahr.com
Sat Sep 28 12:47:56 UTC 2002
On 27 Sep 2002, Justin Kirby wrote:
> We have business hours?
The JSF is a corporation that is based in Denver (as that's where the
secretary is located), I would assume that close of business, and
operating hours, is based on his day... but that's just my guess.
> Not sure if this has been brought up yet, but what about blocking entire
> domains, or implementing some type of pattern matching on the JID?
> <item jid="(\d*)@domain.com" type="deny"/>
Could the current protocol not already block an entire domain? It does JID
matching, but if the JID is just 'domain.com', doesn't that imply
'*@domain.com' based on the current behavior of most software? I don't
know if is explicit in the JEP, but maybe it should be. I would, also,
think that 'x at domain.com/y' should block that resource from that user.
As for using pattern matching in JIDs, I don't think its necessary. In
your example, you used a RegExp, but what happens when somebody is using a
client that is written in a language that doesn't support RegExp's.
> On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 13:07, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> > I hereby issue a Last Call for discussion of JEP-0016 (Server-Based
> > Privacy Rules). This Last Call will end at the close of business on
> > Wendesday, 2002-10-09. If you have comments or concerns about this JEP,
> > please voice them now. Thanks.
> > http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0016.html
> > Peter
> > --
> > Peter Saint-Andre
> > Jabber Software Foundation
> > http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.html
> > _______________________________________________
> > Standards-JIG mailing list
> > Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
More information about the Standards