[Standards-JIG] JEP-0085: suggested triggers

Nikos Kouremenos kourem at gmail.com
Thu Sep 8 11:22:53 CDT 2005


On 9/8/05, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at jabber.org> wrote:
> However, we did not have unanimity on my proposed change to <paused/>...
> 
> From:
> 
> User was composing but stops interacting with the input interface for a
> short period of time (e.g., 5 seconds) or starts interacting with
> another chat interface or application.
> 
> To:
> 
> User was composing but has not interacted with the message input
> interface for a short period of time (e.g., 5 seconds).
>
> In particular, Ian Paterson maintains that it is important for the user
> to know if another chat participant has switched focus, even for less
> than the suggested paused timeout. This does not seem all that useful to
> me (again, it's prospective notification), but I promised I would raise
> the issue on this list before the Council decides one way or another.

Peter, why is this not useful?

Ian, why is this useful?

I mean can you share with list the details of disagreement?
Afterall we are talking about an interval of 5 seconds

-- 
Nikos Kouremenos | Jabber ID: nkour at jabber.org | http://members.hellug.gr/nkour



More information about the Standards-JIG mailing list