[Standards-JIG] Re: password-protected room with no password (MUC)
julien.puydt at laposte.net
Mon Sep 19 19:29:36 UTC 2005
Nolan Eakins a écrit :
> Jacques Belissent wrote:
>> The use case in which a conference is password-protected
>> (muc#roomconfig_passwordprotected=1) and muc#roomconfig_roomsecret is
>> not configured or left blank, is not well described in the spec.
>> Is setting this configuration considered legal?
> Those two seem a little redundant. I would interpret a blank password as
> the room not being password protected. So out of you list I personally
> would pick:
>> - let everyone in regardless of password?
> This one. :-)
> Does anyone disagree with me? If not then perhaps the check box option
> needs to be dropped?
I disagree. I would let the room with an empty password, since it's what
has been configured and it's possible to respect it.
Snark on #gnomemeeting
More information about the Standards