[Standards-JIG] Re: password-protected room with no password (MUC)

Julien PUYDT julien.puydt at laposte.net
Mon Sep 19 19:29:36 UTC 2005

Nolan Eakins a écrit :
> Jacques Belissent wrote:
>> Hi,
>> The use case in which a conference is password-protected 
>> (muc#roomconfig_passwordprotected=1) and muc#roomconfig_roomsecret is 
>> not configured or left blank, is not well described in the spec.
>> Is setting this configuration considered legal?
> Those two seem a little redundant. I would interpret a blank password as 
> the room not being password protected. So out of you list I personally 
> would pick:
>> - let everyone in regardless of password?
> This one. :-)
> Does anyone disagree with me? If not then perhaps the check box option 
> needs to be dropped?

I disagree. I would let the room with an empty password, since it's what 
has been configured and it's possible to respect it.

Snark on #gnomemeeting

More information about the Standards mailing list