[Standards-JIG] Re: password-protected room with no password (MUC)

Julien PUYDT julien.puydt at laposte.net
Mon Sep 19 14:29:36 CDT 2005


Nolan Eakins a écrit :
> Jacques Belissent wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> The use case in which a conference is password-protected 
>> (muc#roomconfig_passwordprotected=1) and muc#roomconfig_roomsecret is 
>> not configured or left blank, is not well described in the spec.
>>
>> Is setting this configuration considered legal?
> 
> 
> Those two seem a little redundant. I would interpret a blank password as 
> the room not being password protected. So out of you list I personally 
> would pick:
> 
>> - let everyone in regardless of password?
> 
> 
> This one. :-)
> 
> Does anyone disagree with me? If not then perhaps the check box option 
> needs to be dropped?

I disagree. I would let the room with an empty password, since it's what 
has been configured and it's possible to respect it.

Snark on #gnomemeeting



More information about the Standards-JIG mailing list