[Standards-JIG] proto-JEP: Flagging the Primary Resource

Ralph Meijer jabber.org at ralphm.ik.nu
Thu Sep 29 08:50:54 CDT 2005


On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 11:48:00AM +0200, Tomasz Sterna wrote:
> 2005/9/28, Ralph Meijer <jabber.org at ralphm.ik.nu>:
> > I strongly disagree. 'primary' is the short name of this proposal
> 
> And when we come up with another primary "thing" how will we label it?
> 
> > For comparison consider:
> >  - muc
> >  - amp
> >  - si
> 
> I think these are very descriptive, shortened though.

Ah, but I argue that you didn't when muc was brand new. You would have
to know what muc stands for.

To counter your question above: what if we come up with a Secret
Identities protocol?

To be clear, that question is rhetorical.

-- 
Groetjes,

ralphm



More information about the Standards-JIG mailing list