[Standards-JIG] Re: UPDATED: JEP-0163 (Personal Eventing via Pubsub)

[Peter Saint-Andre]

Gary Burd wrote:
> On 8/2/06, Ian Paterson <ian.paterson at clientside.co.uk> wrote:
>> For example, the "Open" access model will be an essential building
>> block for
>> countless protocols. It is already necessary for many existing protocols,
>> including publishing public keys (JEP-0189) and, for many users, avatars
>> (JEP-0084). Therefore, IMHO, PEP clients MAY use the "Open" model, but
>> PEP
>> services MUST support it.
>>
>> This will require a little more server-side protocol support - since node
>> creation/subscribe/unsubscribe would also need to be moved to the "A PEP
>> service MUST" list.
> 
> I don't think it's a "little" more work.
> 
> The problem with "open" is that the server must store the subscription
> data.  This is an avenue for abuse that makes "open" more difficult to
> support than "presence" and "roster".

There may be a useful distinction here between must-implement and
must-deploy...

/psa

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20060803/f28f8c0f/smime.bin