[Standards-JIG] JEP-0154: LDAP object classes

[Peter Saint-Andre]

Ah, OK, that makes sense. It's not a high priority for me, but perhaps
eventually we'll get around to writing such a document... :-)

Jacques Belissent wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> What Pete meant may have been something like similar to (and possibly
> extending) this.
> 
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2798.txt
> 
> (There may be more recent and relevant examples.)
> 
> Standardizing this would enable multiple jabber server (or ldap jud)
> implementations to leverage the same directory data without requiring
> duplication or migration.  That is of course, only for the standard
> subset as specific server implementations will want to store more data
> in ldap than what a lowest common denominator schema permits.
> 
> Jacques
> 
> 
> 
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Over a year ago, Pete Birkinshaw posted a message to this list about
>> adding some additional fields and mappings to JEP-0154 (User Profile):
>>
>> http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards-jig/2005-July/008099.html
>>
>> I have finally gotten around to doing that, so look for a new version of
>> JEP-0154 soon.
>>
>> Also, Pete mentions the possibility of defining a Jabber-specific object
>> class that would include (at a minimum) JID. If anyone on this list
>> knows how we might go about doing that, please ping me off-list.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Peter
>>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20060807/1b31be45/smime.bin