[Standards-JIG] geolocation merge

Tobias Markmann tmarkmann at googlemail.com
Sun Aug 20 08:10:50 CDT 2006


Isn't compression binded to encryption in most cases? TLS secures and
encryptes, for example. But I agree that the design of JEPs shouldn't mind
the size. Since you matter the size you should compress, encrypt and
compress or use another protocol. XML is bloated but human readable.

On 8/20/06, Ralph Meijer <jabber.org at ralphm.ik.nu> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 05:33:21PM -0400, Hal Rottenberg wrote:
> > "Since this protocol will often be used from mobile devices, size of
> > XML is a factor."
> >
> > Can we strike this?  Mobile XMPP is a relatively common thing now.  If
> > bandwidth is a concern, you should be using stream encryption.  XMPP
> > is wordy, altering one JEP to suit one class of devices doesn't make a
> > lot of sense.
>
> Compression, not encrypyion, right? I agree.
>
> --
> Groetjes,
>
> ralphm
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20060820/8dce69db/attachment.htm


More information about the Standards-JIG mailing list