[Standards-JIG] iq for ibb

[Maciek Niedzielski]

>  Since iq has also been introduced for ibb recently
> (http://www.jabberstudio.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/cvs/xmpp/extensions/xep-0047.xml?r1=1.2&r2=1.4),
> is there any way for client to declare that they prefer or support one
> over other ? None of the older clients are going to understand iq ibb
> stanzas for example : same for servers.

I'd suggest adding disco features:
<feature var="http://jabber.org/protocol/ibb#message-transport" />
<feature var="http://jabber.org/protocol/ibb#iq-transport" />

Plus make message transport a MUST requirement, so older implementations
can blindly send messages without checking peer's features.

-- 
Maciek                       A: It's against natural order of reading.
 xmpp:machekku at uaznia.net   Q: Why is that?
 xmpp:machekku at chrome.pl   A: People answering above quoted text.
                          Q: What's the most annoying on newsgroups?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 257 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20061205/827160c8/signature.pgp