[Standards-JIG] iq for ibb

[Maciek Niedzielski]

Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Maciek Niedzielski wrote:
>> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>> Maciek Niedzielski wrote:
>>>> If I try sending iq, but other peer doesn't support them, it returns
>>>> feature-not-implemented. Then I can retry sending a message.
>>> Well a good XMPP application should already return such an error (either
>>> feature-not-implemented or service-unavailable). That's why IQ is so
>>> nice. :-)
>> Yes, I know, and that's how my solution works: Everyone implementing new
>> version of the XEP should be prepared to get this error and treat is as
>> "please switch to messages".
> Exactly. Is an implementation note in order?
It never hurts to add a note :)
And if someone already came here to ask about it, then it means that
this note would be really useful.

-- 
Maciek                       A: It's against natural order of reading.
 xmpp:machekku at uaznia.net   Q: Why is that?
 xmpp:machekku at chrome.pl   A: People answering above quoted text.
                          Q: What's the most annoying on newsgroups?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 257 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20061206/771f3381/signature.pgp