[Standards-JIG] In order delivery for xep-0047 ?
Matthias Wimmer
m at tthias.eu
Thu Dec 7 09:21:21 CST 2006
Mridul schrieb:
>
> In order processing is required - which need not translate into in
> order delivery.
> And which does not actually translate in case there is heavy load if
> using async sockets.
IMHO delivering messages is part of processing a message. Not delivering
messages in-order has been considered a bug for a long time.
If you are binding a XMPP stream on a transport protocol, that does not
guarantee in-order delivery by itself, your binding would have to ensure
the reordering.
Tot kijk
Matthias
More information about the Standards-JIG
mailing list