[Standards-JIG] JEP-0060 Publisher Model - nodehirarchypermissions
bernhard
bz at datenkueche.com
Tue May 30 16:37:13 CDT 2006
Hi
>> The node hierarchy ejabberd has, is not a bug. yes/no
>>
>
> It sure seems that way.
>
ejabberd has no collection nodes but "normal nodes" that are not "leaf
nodes" and not "collection nodes".
This nodes have "normal nodes" and "items" as child nodes.
A "normal node" does not exist - if I understand your answer.
In my question - because I thought that it is NOT a bug - I asked "NOT a
bug"
If it is a bug, this makes no sense for me.
Why have collection nodes and leaf nodes?
Why not unify that?
In a filesystem there are directories and files.
In pubsub we have "directories", "files" and "items".
"directories" are spezial files - in XML world we don't need that.
Think about mapping XML - PubSub subTree.
Or navigation through a pubsub graph.
Do we really need a leaf node the is called "index.pubsub" (like
index.html) ?
Think about a hierachical wikipedia like system. Sometimes it is
nessessary to extend things.
XML is extensible.
A "node" is not extensible if it is not possible to make a child node of
this node.
A "leaf node" is the "item" I thought.
Bernhard
More information about the Standards-JIG
mailing list