[Standards-JIG] RE: Standards-JIG] MUC Invitations, Jingle Relays,
and Big Problems
Lukáš 'Spike' Polívka
lukas.polivka at gmail.com
Tue Nov 7 13:31:39 CST 2006
I'd like to apologise, it was a mistake. :(
Lukas
On 11/7/06, Lukáš 'Spike' Polívka <lukas.polivka at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/7/06, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at jabber.org> wrote:
> > Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> >
> > > I think we need to work on building trust in the network as a
> > > whole. For example, it might help if most servers on the network (and by
> > > extension add-on services hosted at subdomains of those servers, such as
> > > MUC and pubsub services) were identified by X.509 certificates. That's
> > > one reason I've been working on a proposal to establish an intermediate
> > > certification authority for the XMPP network:
> > >
> > > http://www.jabber.org/jsf/ica-proposal.html
> >
> > Going beyond that, we'd need such entities to also digitally sign their
> > stanzas. But I'm not going to post more about that until I've had a
> > chance to read up on XML digital signatures... ;-)
> >
> > /psa
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> IM (XMPP/Jabber/Google Talk): spike411 at jabber.cz
> ICQ, AIM, MSN: Never ever!
>
--
IM (XMPP/Jabber/Google Talk): spike411 at jabber.cz
ICQ, AIM, MSN: Never ever!
More information about the Standards-JIG
mailing list