[Standards] PEP private nodes
Olivier Goffart
ogoffart at kde.org
Mon Apr 9 15:33:16 CDT 2007
Le lundi 9 avril 2007, Rachel Blackman a écrit :
> >> Now, imagine the namespace for these Private Storage nodes also
> >> coincides with both disco and pubsub, then you can use the
> >> niceties of
> >> pubsub to get your notifications using that protocol.
> >
> > Would all private nodes be pubsub nodes (i.e., nodes from which you
> > could receive notifications)? Or is notification an add-on?
>
> I think private storage nodes should notify all the user's
> connections, yes. That means if you change something on one client,
> all the connected clients that care about it automagically pick up
> the change. Those that don't... well, they can just ignore it.
>
> Keeps it simple, and still quite useful. :)
I think it is enough to notify only clients that previously requested the
node.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070409/a1f0cb64/attachment.pgp
More information about the Standards
mailing list