[Standards] Re: IDNA text for rfc3920bis

[Peter Saint-Andre]

Matthias Wimmer wrote:
> Hi Joe!
> 
> Joe Hildebrand schrieb:
>> Agree with Bruce here.  I use a setup with local names often enough 
>> that I'd like it to be legal.
> 
> What's wrong with using "romeo.localhost" and "juliet.localhost" instead 
> of using "romeo" and "juliet"? These addresses would also conform RFC 2606.
> 
> I've also changed the default configuration of jabberd14 before I 
> released 1.6.0 to even have all internal-only addresses below the 
> localhost pseudo-TLD. (e.g. "sessions.localhost", "xdbsql.localhost", 
> "c2s.localhost" and that like).

Do such addresses work in, say, a distributed cluster?

Peter

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070416/95272983/smime-0001.bin