[Standards] updated STUN discovery proposal
mridul at sun.com
Thu Apr 19 03:28:10 UTC 2007
Chris Mullins wrote:
> I don't know how the original authors will feel about it (they never
> responded in the thread), but I quite like it.
> I think it's an excellent balance of flexible, simple, and yet still
> meets all the requirements.
> I would like to see us start leveraging this for more types of things -
> available conferencing components,
And in the end discover pubsub componets using ... pubsub :-)
What happened to disco items/info ?
>configured transports, and other
> similar things immediately come to mind...
> Chris Mullins
> -----Original Message-----
> From: standards-bounces at xmpp.org [mailto:standards-bounces at xmpp.org] On
> Behalf Of Peter Saint-Andre
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 3:48 PM
> To: standards at xmpp.org
> Subject: [Standards] updated STUN discovery proposal
> I've updated the STUN discovery proposal to reflect feedback from the
> XMPP Council (use pubsub instead of a specialized IQ protocol):
More information about the Standards