[Standards] "storage:*" namespaces

[Peter Saint-Andre]

Kevin Smith wrote:
> On 17 Aug 2007, at 16:50, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> I propose that we write new specs to replace XEP-0048 and XEP-0145
> 
> I don't really know what's wrong with 48 - it's deployed, it works, and
> once it's updated to the new private spec the last of the complaints
> that I know of will be gone. Do we need to reinvent the wheel?

To change the namespace.

Or we could do that when upgrading the spec from Historical + Active to
Standards Track + Draft.

>> specify that the payloads can be stored in iq:private or pubsub (i.e.,
>> using XEP-0223).
> 
> Yes
> 
>> XEP-0209 could be updated in place.
> 
> Yes
> 
>> XEP-0008 should be
>> deprecated once XEP-0084 advances to Draft.
> 
> I thought 8 had been retracted, and it's evil, so I'm not really sure
> why it's even historical.

It's Deferred. I think that needs to change to Deprecated, but we may
want to wait until XEP-0084 advances.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7354 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070817/baee3cd5/attachment.bin