[Standards] XEP-0166: references to XEP-0155 and XEP-0168

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Mon Dec 3 14:16:44 CST 2007


Lauri Kaila wrote:
> 2007/12/1, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im>:
>> (1) XEP-0155 and XEP-0168 are not normative dependencies in XEP-0166,
>> and we mention them only to help implementors. However, I think it would
>> be best to move those references to XEP-0208. I am also open to delaying
>> the advancement of XEP-0208 until we have more experience with Jingle
>> technologies.
>>
>> (2) XEP-0168 probably is still immature and I think it would be best for
>> the Council to delay advancement of this spec.
>>
>> In a way, the whole resource determination problem is orthogonal to
>> XEP-0166. Once you figure out the resource, use XEP-0166. How you figure
>> out the resource is up to you.
> 
> I totally agree.

Good. :)

I will modify XEP-0166 accordingly. I hope to push out a revised version
in the next few days.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20071203/6f52b10a/attachment.bin 


More information about the Standards mailing list