[Standards] IETF SASL WG meeting

[Tony Finch]

On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Justin Karneges wrote:
>
> Is the idea that you should be able to bind to an underlying privacy layer if
> it is stronger than what SASL can provide?

Yes, typically for relatively simple SASL password authentication
mechanisms (replacements for CRAM-MD5 etc.) that don't provide a security
layer.

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finch  <dot at dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
SHANNON: SOUTH 6 TO GALE 8, PERHAPS SEVERE GALE 9 LATER. VERY ROUGH BECOMING
HIGH. RAIN. MODERATE OR POOR.