[Standards] XEP-0118: music rating?

[Peter Saint-Andre]

FYI from the SIMPLE WG list, a suggestion to include music rating in the
XEP-0118 format. Not a bad idea, IMHO...

/psa

-------- Original Message --------
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:57:18 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im>
To: Thomson, Martin <Martin.Thomson at andrew.com>
Subject: Re: [Simple] other parameters around gaming for the AMI document

Thomson, Martin wrote:

> A few more for music that I'm surprised don't exist in the XMPP
> format.
> 
> Disc (for albums this is easy, but a more generic name might be
> appropriate for other audio like podcasts - to use a dead-tree
> analogy you could use "volume" instead if you consider a "track" as a
> chapter, but unfortunately that implies something else when talking
> about audio)

In the XMPP format that is the <source/> element.

> Year (or release date) Album Artist (for collections, or where
> individual tracks have specific collaborators) Publisher

I think you should be able to find all that information at the URI about
the track. Why include all that metadata in presence?

> Rating (itunes, winamp use a 1..5 star system, but 1..10 would allow
> for half stars)

This one is more interesting, thanks for the suggestion.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/



-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: file:///tmp/nsmail-1.txt
Url: http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20071217/fecc210d/attachment.txt 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20071217/fecc210d/attachment.bin