[Standards] An hole in the XEP-0045 (Multi-user Chat)?

[Peter Saint-Andre]

Fulvio Satta wrote:
> Hi, I'm new in this ml, and I'm sorry if I'll use some bad English.
> 
> In the http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#continue section is 
> explined how to convert an one-to-one chat in a MUC, but I don't understand 
> how and if a client can know what is the message thread.

That's a good point.

> I've not find the <thread/> tag in the XEP, and I have re-check the RFC 3921, 
> but the <thread/> tag is defined in the RFC 3921 only in the message stanzas, 

Correct.

> and the MUC XEP use the presence stanzas for this task.

For what task? Presence stanzas are used to create the room, not send
the invitations etc.

> I don't know if I've done some mistake, if it is the case I'm sorry and I 
> would appreciate if you will say what I've wrong, but if it isn't in the 
> standard, is, IMHO, a big lack in the 0045 XEP.

I don't know if it is a "big lack" because AFAIK no client developers
have implemented this feature, but I will look at this more before the
XMPP Council votes on approving version 1.23 on January 9. Expect
another list post and SVN check-in soon.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20071218/b86bf63b/attachment.bin