[Standards] Simple Jingle example(s) and spec(s) wanted
Peter Saint-Andre
stpeter at jabber.org
Mon Feb 5 13:57:34 CST 2007
Matt Tucker wrote:
> Peter,
>
>> I agree that ICE is complex, but so is the problem of NAT
>> traversal. My discussions with various people in the VoIP and
>> media space indicate that we really can't avoid using ICE to
>> get things done. That's probably why projects such as
>> Telepathy and FreeSWITCH are building their own
>> (open-source) ICE libraries.
>
> We'll support most of ICE in Wildfire, Spark, and Smack -- at least
> enough to get through firewalls whenever possible. We haven't researched
> implementing the TURN proxy server stuff yet, so we're undecided on
> that.
>
> However, a lot of clients probably won't implement even that amount of
> ICE at first. I do agree that eventually we all need to get there.
> However, the lack of good support even for STUN in a lot of SIP
> environments shows how slowly this can go.
Sad but true. So I think you're right that we need to develop something
in between full ICE + TURN + STUN and nothing. That may well be a
relatively simple mediated TCP|UDP bytestream. Which sounds an awful lot
like XEP-0065, eh?
Peter
--
Peter Saint-Andre
XMPP Standards Foundation
http://www.xmpp.org/xsf/people/stpeter.shtml
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070205/93d58cbf/smime-0001.bin
More information about the Standards
mailing list