[Standards] Re: [Standards-JIG] Proposed XMPP Extension: Collaborative DataObjects

[Peter Saint-Andre]

Krutsch, Michael C. wrote:
> The short answer is that we will be considering Pub/Sub, but as a supporting
> protocol, not the primary one.  This is based on the problem that we are
> trying to solve and the target community.  

Agreed. Eventually we'll want something that is transport-agnostic.

Also we may want to look more seriously at REX, as discussed in the last 
XMPP Council meeting. Ian Paterson, Joonas Govenius, and I are looking 
into REX for whiteboarding and shared document editing, and we hope to 
soon report some results of our research. CDOs seem to fit that mold as 
well. More here:

http://www.w3.org/TR/rex/

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
XMPP Standards Foundation
http://www.xmpp.org/xsf/people/stpeter.shtml

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070118/9d44d993/smime-0001.bin