[Standards] <[CDATA[ in XMPP
Mickaël Rémond
mickael.remond at process-one.net
Mon Jul 30 18:39:34 CDT 2007
Hello,
Le 31 juil. 07 à 01:18, Rachel Blackman a écrit :
> Not that I disagree that XMPP should be defined as a rational
> subset of XML, rather than including the whole spec, but... this
> seems to be needlessly splitting hairs, to me.
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but the definition of XMPP is that you /
> restart the stream/ when you get an opening <stream> element (such
> as after starttls or whatever). Given that the stream starts over
> with the new <stream>, the complete XML stream is indeed still a
> complete and valid document.
>
> (I assume that for the sake of sanity -- and given that at that
> point the /entire stream/ is encrypted -- we can assume that a
> stream would be decrypted before being validated.)
I completly agree. XMPP define a logical wrapper that makes the
manipulated XML apparently correct.
We are on the same page, Rachel :)
--
Mickaël Rémond
http://www.process-one.net/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070731/eb337236/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the Standards
mailing list