[Standards] NEW: XEP-0209 (Metacontacts)

[Yann Leboulanger]

Kevin Smith wrote:
> On 6 Jun 2007, at 16:47, Etan S. C. Reisner wrote:
>> Or alternatively, does the metacontact apply per-group but in all groups
>> and thus this issue doesn't exist at all (which is a scenario I am
>> perfectly willing to accept).
> 
> I confess I'm finding the terminology here a bit confusing still, but
> the way I was suggesting was to duplicate the rendering just as one
> would with the contact themselves.
> 

Yep this is what is done in Gajim, we copy the list of groups of the
first contact in second contact so that metacontcts is rendered in each
group.

-- 
Yann