[OT] Re: [Standards] [Fwd: [Council] meeting minutes, 2007-06-13]

Mridul Muralidharan mridul at sun.com
Wed Jun 13 20:21:49 CDT 2007


Loved the last line in the logs ... almost cinematic :-)

Mridul

Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> FYI.
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:51:35 -0600
> From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at jabber.org>
> To: council at xmpp.org
> Subject: [Council] meeting minutes, 2007-06-13
> 
> Results of the XMPP Council meeting held 2007-06-13...
> 
> Agenda:
> 
> http://www.jabber.org/council/meetings/agendas/2007-06-13.html
> 
> Log:
> 
> http://www.jabber.org/muc-logs/council@conference.jabber.org/2007-06-13.html 
> 
> 
> 0. Roll Call
> 
> Chris Mullins, Ian Paterson, Peter Saint-Andre, and Kevin Smith in
> attendance. Ralph Meijer absent. Quorum achieved.
> 
> 1. Next Meeting
> 
> To be worked out on the council at xmpp.org list. Must be by end of June
> since we need to vote on the certification program specs by end of Q2.
> 
> 2. XEP-0080: User Geolocation
> 
> Approve version 1.4pre2?
> 
> Discussed Ralph's point that the location format could be used with
> different transports. Consensus that pubsub (via PEP) should be the
> recommended transport for location information about human users but
> that this recommendation does not forbid other uses. Peter to write
> proposed text to capture this consensus, after which the Council shall
> decide to approve version 1.4pre3 of XEP-0080.
> 
> 3. XEP-0106: JID Escaping
> 
> Approve version 1.1pre2?
> 
> Chris, Ian, and Kevin +1. Peter to re-read before posting to the list
> that he is satisfied with the changes.
> 
> 4. XEP-0060: Publish-Subscribe
> 
> Approve version 1.10pre1?
> 
> Council members need to review these modifications more thoroughly
> before approving the proposed version.
> 
> 5. XEP-0163: PEP
> 
> Approve version 1.1pre4?
> 
> Council members need to review these modifications more thoroughly
> before approving the proposed version.
> 
> 6. XEP-0211 and XEP-0212
> 
> Acceptable to refer to rfc3920bis and rfc3921bis rather than RFC 3920
> and RFC 3921?
> 
> Kevin in favor of existing RFCs, Peter and Ian in favor of bis drafts,
> Chris neutral. Peter to post to standards at xmpp.org list regarding pros
> and cons in order to seek consensus.
> 
> 7. Priorities for remainder of Council term
> 
> Consensus on adding XEP-0136, XEP-0189, personal publishing, and private
> storage to the roadmap as priorities for 2007.
> 
> /psa
> 
> 



More information about the Standards mailing list