[Standards] Re: Jingle bootstrapping

[Thiago Camargo]

I wrote :
" (Because they think, it can traces the NAT model of their company network. And they got their reasons and "Finish". They aren't that opened to discuss too many changes in network security and model.)"

They obviously have their reasons. Reasons that I completely agreed.
Just trying to show that Companies have restrictions that we must count and respect.

Regards,
Thiago

-----Original Message-----
From: standards-bounces at xmpp.org [mailto:standards-bounces at xmpp.org] On Behalf Of Andreas Monitzer
Sent: terça-feira, 6 de março de 2007 13:37
To: XMPP Extension Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Standards] Re: Jingle bootstrapping

On Mar 06, 2007, at 17:09, Thiago Camargo wrote:

> I worked for 3 years in corporative environments. Just like Jean- 
> Louis, but I think that he must be much larger experience than me.
> So what I usually see is:
>
> * Many Ports are blocked.
> * ICMP not allowed, even internally.
> * STUN not allowed. (Because they think, it can traces the NAT  
> model of their company network. And they got their reasons and  
> "Finish". They aren't that opened to discuss too many changes in  
> network security and model.)
> * Exists several that don't even open high UDP ports for voip.  
> (These ones are the most complicated ones. They usually just allow  
> HTTP, and HTTP through a http proxy.)
>
> And I used to work only with UDP/SIP, and fight good battles  
> against port and protocols blocking.

Should you really help people to violate their company policy? I  
guess there's a reason the system administrators of these networks  
are that restrictive.

andy