Friendly XMPP Branding (Re: [Standards] XMPP vs. Jabber)
Rachel Blackman
rcb at ceruleanstudios.com
Thu Mar 8 17:42:38 CST 2007
> I wonder... can we come up with a better answer than XMPP? XMPP
> is hard to
> say, hard to listen to, and not very informative by name alone.
>
> What about...
Everything else aside...
> XIM? (I kind of like this one, but I'd prefer the X not stand for
> XMPP)
...this just makes me envision an incompetent, megalomaniacal little
green alien invader as a spokesperson. ;)
<message to='tallest at flagship.irken.et/red'
from='zim at earth.outpost.irken.et/moose'>
<body>
I... ZIM! ...have mastered this technology the filthy humans
call 'instant messaging' and have subjegated it for our glorious
ends, my Tallest! MWAHAHAHAHAH!
</body>
</message>
(Oh, come on, I wasn't the only one thinking it!)
Seriously, all Jhonen Vasquez references aside, renaming the system
yet again is not going to do anything to clarify the situation, I
don't think.
--
Rachel Blackman <rcb at ceruleanstudios.com>
Trillian Messenger - http://www.trillianastra.com/
More information about the Standards
mailing list