[Standards] certification etc.
Boyd Fletcher
boyd.fletcher at je.jfcom.mil
Tue Mar 27 11:15:38 CDT 2007
so does anyone have an objection with making stream compression required for
the intermediate suite?
On 3/26/07 6:18 PM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter at jabber.org> wrote:
> Ralph Meijer wrote:
>> On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 18:25 -0400, Fletcher, Boyd C. CIV US USJFCOM JFL
>> J9935 wrote:
>>> I think stream compression should be required for the immediate suite and
>>> File Transfer should be moved to an advanced or a media suite. Many
>>> corporate and government folks have serious issues with allowing file
>>> transfer over their collaboration systems because its hard to ensure that
>>> the files being transferred have been properly scanned for malicious content
>>> like viruses, trojans, worms, etc...
>>
>> That products are certified to a certain suite doesn't mean that
>> deployments should enable/allow certain features...
>>
>
> Right.
>
> Compliance, certification, and the requirement levels in our protocol
> specs are all about what gets implemented in software. How the software
> is deployed is a matter of local service policy.
>
> Peter
More information about the Standards
mailing list