[Standards] updated STUN discovery proposal
Evgeniy Khramtsov
xramtsov at gmail.com
Wed May 2 06:26:24 CDT 2007
Peter Saint-Andre пишет:
> Well, we can't "demand" that STUN servers share private keys with XMPP
> servers either. :)
True, we can't demand anything from STUN server developers. Actually,
the easiest solution is just to implement STUN/TURN support in the XMPP
server and forget about all these interactions :)
>
>> Thus, we can use a JID as a USERNAME and the Private Key as an
>> "anotherprivatekey" in the example above. Then we can transfer
>> computed password to the client in the disco/pubsub stanza.
>
>
> So in that case, the XMPP server hands out the same password to every
> client?
>
No. The password is the sha1(USERNAME, privatekey) so it differs for all
clients.
More information about the Standards
mailing list