[Standards] Re: compliance levels for 2008

[Peter Saint-Andre]

Kevin Smith wrote:
> On 5 May 2007, at 00:43, Fletcher, Boyd C. CIV US USJFCOM JFL J9935 wrote:
>> if the intermediate client spec requires XEP-45 then shouldn't we have an
>> intermediate server spec that does?
> 
> MUC isn't a server requirement, it's a component.

We can't require that an XMPP server supports things like XEP-0045 
directly since that would mean legislating architecture, but we could 
require support either in the server itself or as an add-on component. 
It's worth discussing.

Peter


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070507/f74bf7d3/smime.bin