[Standards] Resource unbinding issue - RFC 3920bis
Peter Saint-Andre
stpeter at stpeter.im
Wed Oct 17 17:23:52 CDT 2007
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 04:14:42PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
<snip/>
> I see what you're saying. If you support the namespace but don't support
> the element name, it's <feature-not-implemented/>. If you support the
> namespace and you support the element name but the element is not
> properly structured (attributes, child elements) then it is
> <bad-request/>. That seems fine to me, and is a good clarification for
> rfc3920bis.
http://svn.xmpp.org:18080/browse/XMPP/trunk/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-rfc3920bis-05.xml?%40diffMode=u&%40diffWrap=s&r1=1292&r2=1293&u=3&ignore=&k=
/psa
More information about the Standards
mailing list