[Standards] XEP licensing

[Michal 'vorner' Vaner]

Hello

On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 10:23:17AM +0200, Remko Tronçon wrote:
> > IIRC, the problem was that
> > the license doesn't allow one to redistribute modified RFCs.
> 
> Why would they want to modify RFCs?

It would be nice to be able to use some RFC as a base of some other
document, but, of course, it could not be called the same RFC. Does the
licence allow creating derived works?

-- 
==
This email has been checked by an automatic damage possibility check system.
It can contain harmful instructions if read backwards.
Internal checker ID: lacol.cr/cte/ << tlah ohce

Michal 'vorner' Vaner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20071022/14fc410f/attachment.pgp