[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: IO DATA

[Peter Saint-Andre]

Luis Peralta wrote:

>    Overall I like this XEP. What I missed are more possible status
>  values for the commands. Being in execution and completed is way too
>  simple for some applications. The initial state after submitting a
>  command would be 'accepted' and letting the client know that  it is in
>  fact sending commands to a batch service. IMO, the state diagram
>  should something like: accepted -> executing -> completed, even if in
>  the current spec 'executing' means both things.

Is this at the XEP-50 level or the IO-Data level?

>    I would also explicitly refer the possibility of canceling a
> running command by using xep-50 'cancel' action.

Agreed.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20080404/e8a4c09d/attachment-0001.bin