[Standards] mobile optimizations (was: Re: Google Androïd SDK not XMPP compliant ?)
Fabio Forno
fabio.forno at gmail.com
Thu Feb 14 16:04:07 CST 2008
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Dave Cridland <dave at cridland.net> wrote:
> I've never been all that convinced about binary XML forms. They work
> to a degree with the highly fixed XML in, for example, SyncML, and
> they're pretty good at compressing individual stanza-like objects
> over SMS for things like OMA EMN (Email Message Notification, or
> something - I've long since forgotten what these acronyms stand for),
> but for long-running streams I'm under the impression that studies
> show it'll be outperformed.
>
> So if you're a big fan of Binary XML formats, please bring along your
> figures. :-)
Missing the reference, but you should get the best with binary +
compression, however it's not worth the candle, since EXTENSIBLE
binary xml is not easy (there are fast infosets, but the specification
is incredibly complex) and the gain is not so high
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: ff at jabber.bluendo.com
More information about the Standards
mailing list